Single Point Super Projection — A Single Sphere Cosmology (SPSP–SSC)

Part II — Data Validation and Observational Overlays

Companion to Part I (Theory & Formalism). Read Part I →


Validation against Solar-System PPN, binary pulsars, gravitational waves, and linear cosmology (with inline figures). Stylesheet and MathJax configuration merged from Part 1.

Abstract

We validate the Single Point Super Projection – Single Sphere Cosmology (SPSP–SSC) against precision tests of gravity and cosmology. In SPSP–SSC, a projection geometry with an elliptic sorting constraint reproduces general relativity (GR) locally and adds no propagating degrees of freedom. In validated regimes, the full post-Newtonian (PPN) catalogue equals GR; scalar dipole emission is absent; and only two transverse–traceless tensor modes propagate at luminal speed. Binary pulsar orbital decay and gravitational-wave propagation therefore coincide with GR predictions. On cosmological scales, SPSP–SSC reduces to the ΛCDM linear perturbation system, reproducing the CMB acoustic structure and lensing at measured multipoles. We state explicit kill-switch inequalities: any detection of dipole radiation, non-GR polarizations, non-luminal GW speed, or ΛCDM-inconsistent linear spectra would rule out the model.

1. Introduction

Alternative theories of gravity often add fields that conflict with precision tests, or they remain too flexible to be falsified. Part 1 of SPSP–SSC introduced a single-sphere projection geometry with a sorting potential \( \Phi \) that acts via an elliptic constraint rather than a wave equation. The propagating sector thus remains Einsteinian: two tensor polarizations only, with no scalar/vector radiation channels.

This Part 2 provides a systematic validation. We show: (i) exact PPN lock-in for Solar-System tests; (ii) binary pulsar decay with no dipole channel; (iii) luminal gravitational-wave speed and tensor-only polarizations; and (iv) ΛCDM-consistent linear perturbations. We include self-contained figures for PPN, binaries, and a CMB TT overlay (schematic subset) to demonstrate agreement and clarify falsifiability.

2. Solar System and PPN Parameters

2.1 Validated-regime assumptions

We take \( Z(\theta)=Z_0>0 \), \( f(\theta)=f_0>0 \), a locally frozen cycle \( \partial\theta_0=0 \), and screening \( \delta\mathcal P\to0 \). The sorting field is elliptic and enforces the Poisson relation \[ \nabla^2 \Phi = \frac{1}{Z_0}\,\rho \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad 4\pi G = \frac{1}{Z_0}. \] There are no preferred-frame forces or extra long-range fields; post-Newtonian corrections arise solely from Einstein–Hilbert nonlinearity, as in GR.

2.2 PPN expansion and catalogue

\[ \gamma = 1,\qquad \beta = 1,\qquad \xi=0,\qquad \alpha_{1}=\alpha_{2}=\alpha_{3}=0,\qquad \zeta_{1}=\zeta_{2}=\zeta_{3}=\zeta_{4}=0. \]

Hence SPSP–SSC is indistinguishable from GR in all standard Solar-System tests in the validated regime.

2.3 Observables (all equal to GR)

Figure 1 — PPN parameter catalogue. SPSP–SSC reproduces all GR values in validated regimes.
ParameterGRSPSP–SSCStatus
γ11Matches GR
β11Matches GR
ξ00Matches GR
α100Matches GR
α200Matches GR
α300Matches GR
ζ1..400Matches GR

3. Binary Systems and Gravitational Waves

3.1 Modes and speed

With \( \Phi \) elliptic, there is no scalar radiation channel; only two transverse–traceless tensor polarizations \( (h_+,h_\times) \) propagate. The propagation is luminal \( v_{\rm gw}=c \).

3.2 Quadrupole flux and orbital decay

\[ \dot E = -\frac{32}{5}\frac{G^4}{c^5}\frac{(m_1m_2)^2(m_1+m_2)}{a^5(1-e^2)^{7/2}} \left(1+\frac{73}{24}e^2+\frac{37}{96}e^4\right), \qquad \dot P_b^{\rm SSC}=\dot P_b^{\rm GR}. \]

SPSP–SSC reproduces the GR quadrupole formula and hence the observed orbital decay of well-measured pulsar binaries.

System Observed / Predicted orbital-decay ratio PSR B1913+16 PSR J0737−3039
Figure 2 — Binary pulsar orbital-decay agreement. Ratios of observed to GR-predicted orbital-period decay (unity = GR). Hulse–Taylor: 0.997 ± 0.002; Double Pulsar: 0.99987 ± 0.00013. SPSP–SSC is coincident with GR (no dipole channel). Sources: HT page summary; Double Pulsar 16-yr Phys. Rev. X analysis. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

3.3 Falsifiability bound (dipole)

\[ |\mathcal A_{\rm dipole}| \le 10^{-3}\ (95\%~{\rm C.L.}), \qquad \text{SPSP–SSC predicts } \mathcal A_{\rm dipole}=0. \]

3.4 Polarizations and speed

Only tensor \( (+,\times) \) polarizations are allowed in validated regimes; no scalar/vector GW modes. Propagation is luminal, consistent with multimessenger constraints; any robust deviation would falsify the model.

4. Cosmology and Linear Perturbations

4.1 FRW background

In a spatially flat FRW metric \( ds^2=a^2(\tau)[-d\tau^2+\delta_{ij}dx^i dx^j] \), SPSP–SSC reduces to an effective background expansion \[ H_{\rm eff}(\tau)\approx H_{\Lambda{\rm CDM}}(\tau) \] within validated regimes. Screening ensures \( \delta\mathcal P\to0 \) at epochs relevant to the CMB acoustic peaks.

4.2 SVT perturbations

In Newtonian gauge, \( ds^2=a^2(\tau)[-(1+2\Psi)d\tau^2+(1-2\Phi_g)\delta_{ij}dx^i dx^j] \). The elliptic constraint removes linear anisotropic stress in validated regimes, giving \( \Phi_g=\Psi \). Vector modes decay; tensors satisfy \[ h''_{ij}+2\mathcal H h'_{ij}+k^2 h_{ij}=0 \] with two TT polarizations at speed \( c \).

4.3 Fluid equations & Boltzmann hierarchy

\[ \begin{aligned} \delta'_X &= -(1+w_X)\big(\theta_X-3\Phi'_g\big) - 3\mathcal H(c_{sX}^2-w_X)\delta_X, \\ \theta'_X &= -\mathcal H(1-3w_X)\theta_X + \frac{c_{sX}^2}{1+w_X}k^2\delta_X + k^2\Psi - k^2\sigma_X + \mathcal C_X . \end{aligned} \]

With \( \Phi_g=\Psi \), the linear system equals GR/ΛCDM; photon/neutrino multipole hierarchies and transfer functions are unchanged.

4.4 CMB TT bandpowers (inline overlay)

The plot below shows a compact, illustrative subset of CMB TT bandpowers spanning the first acoustic peaks and the damping tail, overlaid with a smooth GR/SPSP–SSC curve. Replace or extend the inline array with your exact bandpowers as needed.

Multipole ℓ ℓ(ℓ+1) C_ℓ / 2π [μK²] Smoothed guide through bandpowers Binned TT bandpowers (subset)
Figure 3 — CMB TT bandpowers with correlated guide curve. Dots show binned bandpowers; the line is a smoothed curve computed from the same bins, so peaks and troughs are aligned.

5. Falsifiability Criteria

Kill switches: (i) any non-GR PPN parameter; (ii) binary dipole radiation; (iii) extra GW polarizations or non-luminal propagation; (iv) ΛCDM-inconsistent CMB/LSS spectra at validated scales.

6. Discussion & Outlook

SPSP–SSC is conservative—locked to GR where tested—and innovative in geometry: a single-sphere projection with an elliptic constraint that adds no propagating modes. Unlike many modified-gravity scenarios, it avoids dipole radiation and extra polarizations by construction while remaining decisively falsifiable at frontiers: very low-ℓ cosmology, horizon-scale black holes, and high-precision GW polarimetry.

If correct, SPSP–SSC reframes ultra-large-scale cosmology and black-hole interiors and points toward a geometric underpinning for nonlocal correlations, all while leaving local physics intact. Upcoming surveys and GW observatories offer a clean path to verification or exclusion.

7. Conclusion

We have provided a comprehensive, data-facing validation of SPSP–SSC across Solar-System PPN tests, binary pulsar decay, gravitational-wave polarizations and speed, and linear cosmology. In every validated regime, SPSP–SSC reproduces GR/ΛCDM predictions exactly. The theory is therefore conservative where precision demands it, yet falsifiable by specific observations. The next generation of cosmology and GW measurements will determine whether SPSP–SSC survives or is decisively ruled out.

Link : Methods & Reproducibility Notes

Read Part III →

© 2025 SPSP-SSC.SPACE