Solar-System Validation: Perihelion, Light Bending, Shapiro Delay
SPSP–SSC is locked to GR in validated exterior regimes. Below we compute the classic tests (perihelion advance, light deflection, Shapiro delay) to show numerical agreement with general relativity and observations.
Key point. The elliptic constraint introduces no propagating field outside sources. Hence the metric and geodesics reduce to GR, giving identical predictions (PPN parameters: \( \gamma=\beta=1\), others 0). Any significant departure here would falsify the model.
1. Perihelion Advance (Inner Planets)
From the Schwarzschild geodesic equation, the relativistic orbit admits a small precession per orbit:
Converted to arcseconds per century (after subtracting Newtonian perturbations), we obtain the GR excess shown below (SI inputs; JPL ephemerides):
Planet | Semi-major axis \(a\) (m) | Eccentricity \(e\) | Period (days) | \(\Delta\varpi\) (arcsec/orbit) | \(\Delta\varpi\) (arcsec/century) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mercury | 5.7909050×1010 | 0.205630 | 87.969 | 0.10352 | 42.981 |
Venus | 1.0820893×1011 | 0.006772 | 224.701 | 0.05306 | 8.625 |
Earth | 1.495978707×1011 | 0.0167086 | 365.256 | 0.03839 | 3.839 |
Mars | 2.2794382×1011 | 0.0934 | 686.980 | 0.02541 | 1.351 |
Matches GR Mercury’s famous value \(\approx 43''/\text{century}\) is recovered. Venus/Earth/Mars values agree with GR predictions and modern ephemerides (after accounting for planetary perturbations and solar J2).
Constants & conversion steps
- \(GM_\odot = 1.32712440018\times 10^{20}\ \mathrm{m^3\,s^{-2}}\), \(c=299{,}792{,}458\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}\)
- Arcsec/orbit: \( \Delta\varpi_{\text{per orbit}}\times 180/\pi \times 3600 \)
- Orbits/century: \( 36525\ \mathrm{days}/P_\text{planet} \)
2. Light Deflection at the Solar Limb
GR prediction for a light ray with impact parameter \(b\):
At the solar limb (\(b\simeq R_\odot\)), the deflection is
Matches GR This is the classic Eddington value, repeatedly confirmed (optical/radio). SPSP–SSC reproduces the same because exterior geodesics are exactly those of GR.
Numeric
Using \(R_\odot=6.957\times 10^8\ \text{m}\):
Δφ_rad = 4 GM⊙ / (R⊙ c²) = 8.49×10⁻⁶ rad
Δφ_arcsec = Δφ_rad × (180/π) × 3600 ≈ 1.751″
3. Shapiro Time Delay (Superior Conjunction)
For emitter at \(r_E\), receiver at \(r_R\), impact parameter \(b\) (near conjunction), a convenient approximation is:
Taking \(r_E=1\,\mathrm{AU}\), \(r_R\simeq 1.52\,\mathrm{AU}\) (e.g., Earth–Mars) and \(b\simeq R_\odot\), we find
Matches GR The magnitude and logarithmic dependence match the Cassini-era confirmations (SPSP–SSC gives identical Shapiro delay in the Solar System).
Numeric
2GM⊙/c³ ≈ 9.85 μs, ln(4 r_E r_R / b²) ≈ 12.63
Δt ≈ 9.85 μs × 12.56 ≈ 124 μs
Why These Match Exactly in SPSP–SSC
- Elliptic (non-radiative) constraint: no extra scalar/vector waves in the exterior → metric dynamics reduce to GR.
- Screening in high-density regimes: any projection-sector terms are suppressed in the Solar System.
- PPN catalogue: \( \gamma=\beta=1 \), others zero → same perihelion, deflection, redshift, Shapiro delay, frame-dragging as GR.
Falsifiability. Any statistically significant deviation from these GR values in the Solar System would falsify the model. The same lock-in is used for binary pulsar decay and GW phasing (no dipole channel).