SPSP–SSC • Validation Notes (Worked Calculations)
Purpose. These notes show explicit, end-to-end calculations demonstrating that the Single Point Super Projection – Single Sphere Cosmology (SPSP–SSC) reproduces standard GR/SM/QM predictions in validated regimes, and is falsifiable where it differs (dipole radiation, horizon diagnostics, ultra-large scales). No number-fitting is used: we compute from first principles with standard constants.
0) Why SPSP–SSC = GR in validated regimes (1-page derivation)
- Action (validated limit).
\[ S=\int d^4x\,\sqrt{-g}\Big[\tfrac{M_P^2}{2}R+\mathcal L_{\rm SM}-\Phi(\rho-\varepsilon)\Big] \;+\;S_{\rm proj}^{(\text{screened})}. \]Variation w.r.t. \(\Phi\) yields an elliptic constraint; outside matter \((\rho=\varepsilon=0)\), \(\nabla^2\Phi=0\Rightarrow \Phi=\text{const}\) (drops out). Screening makes \(S_{\rm proj}^{(\text{screened})}\to 0\) locally.
- Field equations (exterior). In vacuum: \(G_{\mu\nu}=0\) → Schwarzschild/Kerr solutions; matter is minimally coupled.
- PPN catalogue. Expansion to \(\mathcal O(v^4)\) gives
\[ \boxed{\gamma=\beta=1,\qquad \xi=\alpha_{1,2,3}=\zeta_{1,2,3,4}=0} \]Therefore perihelion, light bending, Shapiro delay, redshift, geodetic and frame-dragging equal GR.
- Radiation sector. \(\Phi\) is non-radiative → no scalar dipole channel; only GR’s two TT modes, \(c_T=1\).
1) Solar System
1.1 Perihelion precession (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars)
Schwarzschild geodesics (or PPN with \(\gamma=\beta=1\)) give the excess precession per orbit
Planet | \(a\) (m) | \(e\) | Period (days) | Excess (″/century) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mercury | 5.7909×1010 | 0.2056 | 87.969 | ≈ 43 |
Venus | 1.0821×1011 | 0.00677 | 224.701 | ≈ 8.6 |
Earth | 1.4960×1011 | 0.01671 | 365.256 | ≈ 3.84 |
Mars | 2.2794×1011 | 0.0934 | 686.980 | ≈ 1.35 |
Matches GR Numbers agree with standard GR values (after removing Newtonian perturbations).
1.2 Light deflection (solar limb)
Matches GR The classic Eddington result; repeatedly confirmed in radio/optical.
1.3 Shapiro time delay (Earth–Mars, superior conjunction)
Matches GR Cassini-level confirmations are reproduced as SPSP–SSC = GR locally.
2) Binary Pulsars & Gravitational Radiation
2.1 Quadrupole orbital decay (Peters–Mathews)
Worked numerics (Hulse–Taylor schematic)
- \(m_1\!=\!m_2\!\approx\!1.4\,M_\odot\), \(e\!=\!0.617\), \(P\!=\!7.75~\text{h}\)
- Predict \(\dot P\approx -2.4\times 10^{-12}\); observed \((-2.402\pm0.002)\times10^{-12}\)
Matches GR SPSP–SSC forbids any scalar dipole channel: \(\mathcal F_{\rm dip}=0\).
2.2 Hard falsifiability bounds (dipole/−1PN)
- Timing excess: \(\displaystyle \Delta_{\rm dip} \equiv \frac{\dot P_{\rm obs}-\dot P_{\rm GR}}{|\dot P_{\rm GR}|} < 10^{-3}\) (required).
- GW flux ratio: \(\displaystyle \frac{|\mathcal F_{\rm dip}|}{\mathcal F_{\rm quad}}<10^{-3}\) (required).
- Frequency-domain phasing: \(|\beta_{-2}|\!<\!\beta_{\rm thr}\) mapped from the flux bound.
3) Redshift, Geodetic, Frame-Dragging
3.1 Gravitational redshift
Pound–Rebka, optical clocks, GPS: reproduced exactly (SPSP–SSC = GR locally).
3.2 Geodetic (de Sitter) precession
3.3 Lense–Thirring (frame-dragging)
4) Cosmology (linear regime)
With \(\Phi_g=\Psi\) and GR conservation, the growth factor obeys
giving the standard \(\Lambda\)CDM growth and lensing at current precision. GW speed is luminal, \(c_T=1\), from the TT action.
5) Reproducibility: constants & inputs
Quantity | Value |
---|---|
Solar \(GM_\odot\) | \(1.32712440018\times10^{20}\ \mathrm{m^3\,s^{-2}}\) |
Speed of light \(c\) | \(299{,}792{,}458\ \mathrm{m\,s^{-1}}\) |
Solar radius \(R_\odot\) | \(6.957\times10^{8}\ \mathrm{m}\) |
Century (seconds) | \(36525\times 86400\) |
Planetary \(a,e,P\) | JPL ephemerides (standard values; shown above) |
6) What is contributed beyond “just reproducing GR”?
- Single-principle derivation: GR/SM/QM emerge as consequences of one projection formalism with an elliptic constraint (not assumed separately).
- Clean falsifiability: strict dipole/GW/ULS bounds; tiny parameter window where novelty can live.
- No added radiative DOF: explains why extra modes are absent in data, without fine-tuning.
- Bridges: quantum embedding (qubit + projector), recursion-wall invariants, and a mathematical outlook that stays independent of numerology.
Bottom line. These worked calculations show SPSP–SSC must match GR where tested; its value is providing a unified origin for that match and sharply defining where and how to try to break it.